1
Validate CGS
Provide conceptual feedback on the Certification Governance Specification and help assess whether the architecture addresses real institutional needs.
Call to Action · CGS Validation & Engagement
Help shape the next generation of certification, learner privacy, and AI reasoning assurance.
This stage is about conceptual validation, pilot participation, consortium formation, and early reference implementation dialogue. If the architecture resonates with your role or institution, this is the place to raise your hand.
Complete the Validation & Engagement Form
Prefer to email directly?
Is your institution ready for the KhanTED shift? Download the EDU Survival Guide.
Note on participation:
this is an informal expression of interest for conceptual validation and collaborative development. Completing the form does not create a legal or financial commitment. It is a request for further information and a seat at the preliminary discussion table.
Four ways to participate
The initiative is designed to welcome different kinds of participants without forcing a single engagement model.
2
Join MVPilots
Participate in Pilot 1 or Pilot 2 to evaluate reasoning durability, Experience Credentials, and independent Arena-based verification.
3
Join a Work Group
Contribute to Epistemic Engineering, Privacy & Identity, Registries & Ledger, or Epistemic Engines as part of a proposed consortium process.
4
Explore Reference Implementations
Help build early implementations of the architecture while preserving the neutral, open, multi-implementation character of CGS.
Who this is for
- Executives and certification leaders exploring reasoning durability standards
- Academic faculty and subject-matter experts who can author or validate reasoning artifacts
- Privacy, identity, security, and AI specialists evaluating the infrastructure model
- Potential reference implementation partners interested in pilot collaboration
- Independent researchers interested in standards, validation, or governance
What the form helps us learn
- Whether the architecture resonates with your role or institution
- Which kinds of pilots are worth prioritizing
- Which consortium work groups should form first
- Where reference implementation interest may exist
- What expertise and perspectives are missing
Complete the CGS Validation & Engagement Form
The form is designed to work for both lightweight feedback and deeper expressions of interest. You can identify your role, indicate resonance, select possible engagement pathways, or skip directly to final comments.
What the form covers
- Contact and organizational context (optional)
- Degree of resonance with the initiative
- Preferred engagement pathway
- Role-based interest areas
- Final comments or expertise areas
Only the role-selection question needs to be mandatory if you want to preserve a low-friction path for anonymous or near-anonymous feedback.
Frequently asked questions
These are the questions most people have when deciding whether to engage at an early stage.
Does submitting the form create a legal or financial commitment?
No. The current form is an informal expression of interest for conceptual validation, collaborative development, and preliminary discussion.
Do I need to represent an institution to participate?
No. Independent researchers, faculty, technical specialists, and potential implementation partners are all welcome.
Can I provide feedback without signing up for a pilot or consortium role?
Yes. The form can support simple validation feedback, role-based interest, or fuller engagement depending on your preference.
What happens after I submit the form?
Responses will help prioritize briefings, pilot conversations, working-group formation, and early reference implementation discussions.